USED JAPANESE VEHICLES IN DURBAN - SALES AND TRANSPORT SERVICES
Our Services are the most sought after services in the Industry of Used cars from Japan.No other company can take you to more than 14 dealerships in and around Durban,but we do.You buy from any garage of your choice.You only pay us R350 and we will be at your service the whole day.Please make you Booking a day or two before you make you trip to Durban
For Bookings Call Tami +27 83784 1046 or Emmanuel +2773 193 6294
Although a subcompact hatchback and a compact wagon aren’t typically competitor, both Nissan Cube vs Honda Fit regularly stays in the same list of consideration. Both are very similar as having almost the same body length, good space for passengers and cargo; and last but not important, a high score in crash tests. For someone who’re looking for an affordable vehicle in the city, then it’s going to be hard to choose between these two. Therefore, today Cars From Japan will give you more clues to choose your city car between Nissan Cube vs Honda Fit.
Nissan Cube Over View
Nissan Cube public in 1998, and initially sold only in Japan. Later, Cube got it into North American and European markets since 2009 but in 2014 yet again exclusive only in Japan. Nissan Cube has been recognized as Top Safety Pick by IIHS; 2010 Automobile Design of the Year Award; and (sounds funny to me), AAA Top vehicle picks for dog owners. Third Generation of Nissan Cube is from 2008-1014.
Honda Fit Over View
Since its first introduced in 2001, despite it hardly good looking shape; Honda Fit always stays on top of its rangefor smart space design, yet fun to drive, excellent visibility and fuel fuel-efficient. Over the years, Honda Fit won many awards such as Japan best car of the year; MotorWeek Drivers’ Choice Awards 2007—Best of the Year; 2012 Best Cars for Families Awards – No. 1 in Affordable Small Cars; and so on… Honda Fit is also known as Honda Jazz and currently in it’s Third Generation since 2013.
Nissan Cube vs Honda Fit Comparison
Performance and Fuel Consumption
For some tests, Fits has better acceleration but Cube is finer in highway driving range. In most of the driving test on city, highway and combined road, Honda Fit proved it is more eco-friendly by using less gas than Nissan.
In my point of view, I have to say Nissan Cube have a trendy – stylish looking. If you want something stunning and catch the attention of everyone around, Cube is surely your call. Otherwise, for someone who favors a decent look, immerse into the crowd, Fit will serve best.
In this field, Cube is highly more focus on passengers experience. Cube’s front row head room and leg room are larger, which means more comfort and relax for drivers to enjoy their ride. Cube’s second-row seat as well gives more space to guests or family members on board. There is no discuss Nissan Cube wins the passenger comfort challenge in Nissan Cube vs. Honda Fit fight.
In the normal state, Fit trunk space provides about 1.5 to 1.7 times more than Nissan. Nevertheless, when you fold of the rare seat rows, Cube reveals it’s hidden spaces and is slightly more spacious than Fit. So it actually depends on your needs whether you want a bit less comfort but both people and stuff; or lots of space for either people or stuff.
Nissan Cube vs Honda Fit Final Words
I would say, Honda Fit is a secure choice for all ages. Seats for 5 people, enough cargo space and a normal look. On the contrary, Nissan Cube focus more on young ages with a fascinating look, fun to stay in for both driver and passengers.
Compact Sports Utility Vehicles are always very popular among the mass. Here, I am going to compare Toyota RAV4 vs Nissan X-Trail on many standards. Both the cars are famous for their value of the money features and excellent grip on the road. So, Let us see, what the real facts about both are.
Toyota RAV4 vs Nissan X-Trail
If you are looking for an economical mid-size SUV that perfectly serves as a family cargo, Toyota RAV4 and Nissan X-Trail both are in the race with equal points. However, as we include the features comparison, the battle of Toyota RAV4 vs Nissan X-Trail is definitely interesting. Let us start the countdown.
Toyota RAV4: The SUV is not exactly fit for five people as the fifth passenger can face small legroom. However, the interior of the car has a number of features like power window, keyless entry, enough storage space etc. The carcass of the SUV is just like any other modern car. Power locks, foldable rear seats, shiftlever, etc. add the extra charm. The SUV is entirely dedicated to the small family where the cargo area includes a cup holder, shopping bag hooks, tie down hooks and door panel pockets. The foldable rear seat adds extra space to the cargo area, which is quite versatile. Map-lights, digital clocks, seat’s height adjustment etc. appends additional features to make it comfortable on the road.
Nissan X-Trail: The SUV is perfect for five adults. The car is spacious but the feel of softness is missing somewhere. However, the peculiar instrument panels, extra glove box, easily accessible control, low mounted AC vents are other features, which are impressive. The chassis of the car is strong and includes all the safety features like dual front airbags, electronic brake-force distribution or anti-lock braking system.
Toyota RAV4 vs Nissan X- Trails round 1 goes to Nissan for sure.
Toyota RAV4: The car is available in three-door as well as five-door versions. It shows the entire curve beautifully along with the high window, funky wheels, and less aggressive AWD vehicle. The rear door is hinged on the right. So, It may be problematic for the right-hand drivers. The car comes with 16” steel wheels, fog light and 70 series all seasons tires. The optional lockable center and short, front and rear overhangs add some extra oomph.
Nissan X-Trail: Are you looking for a boxier SUV? Here is your perfect car. The monstrous X-Trail is a crossover SUV. It has a large rear hatch, optional roof rack, light towing capacity and heavy looks. Although, X-trail is not economical compared to the RAV4, but on the road it is amazing. The car is fitted with 65 series all-season tires, large power sunroof, and alloy wheels.
Toyota RAV4 vs Nissan X-trial round 2 goes to Toyota undisputedly.
Performance on the Road
Toyota RAV4: The driving is smooth in urban areas, but as soon as the SUV goes off road, the problem starts. The small 1.8l to 2.0l engine makes the car not so perfect on the highways. The 127 HP is definitely not, what one looks in an SUV. Here, the noisy Powertrain spoils the meaning of fun driving for sure. Apart, the SUV is fuel-efficient when one drives it at a moderate speed. The car is great for a smooth drive with the family as it is easy to handle. At turns, the car starts to shine. It can execute a three-point turn, which makes it fun to drive on busy and packed roads. The vehicle is reliable when one gets comfortable with the wheels.
Nissan X-Trail: Opposite to the RAV4, X-Trail is not for the urban runabout. Its tall features give great views and its strong chassis makes it easy to drive off the road. Although it does not come under sports car segment, but the interior, versatility, and space can challenge any sports car easily. It is entirely a powerful car with four-cylinder engines. Even the small gas capacity (2.0 l) delivers 40HP, which is amazing. X-Trail GT (turbocharged version) of Nissan delivers 280hp with the same gas capacity. The four-speed automatic transmission, manual transmission or five-speed transmission, either 2WD drive or 4WD drive is the real example of a versatile car.
Now, because of the less aerodynamic body, the car is not flexible on the road. However, on the bad road condition, one can change FWD to AWD mode of driving for a swift flow. Furthermore, the driving on LOCK-MODE is not safe, especially in 4WD mode. Still, the X-Trail steering and suspension are well tuned. The car is easy to control and a bliss for a long drive on tough roads.
Toyota RAV4 vs Nissan X-Trail round 3 goes to Nissan again for its off-road control quality.
The Ultimate Winner: Toyota RAV4 vs Nissan X-Trail
No doubt, Nissan X-Trail is a better choice than a Toyota RAV4 if one is looking for a sturdy car, with a powerful performance in the end. Still, choosing a car is one’s own personal choice. If one check Toyota RAV4 vs Nissan X-Trail, On the urban road, Toyota RAV4 performs better while off-road, it cannot even chase Nissan X-Trail. Whichever car you choose, look for safety, smooth drive and your requirement first and then only decide.
Brief Comparison between Toyota Prius vs Toyota Arius
It is a full hybrid car with an electric mid-size hatchback. Formerly it was a sedan. The Prius which was developed and manufactured by Toyota is among the cleanest vehicles sold in the United States. It also got ranked as the most efficient gasoline-powered car in 2016. First launched for sale in Japan but later Toyota Prius ruled the global market after being launched worldwide in 2000.
It was sold over 90 international markets. Toyota later expanded the Prius family and added more automobiles to its line. It globally accumulated the sale of 5.7 million in 2016
The Toyota Auris has been derived from the Toyota Corolla. It is a compact hatchback. The first generation was started with Corolla and the second one had compact five-door hatchback and station wagon. More luxurious Auris was named Toyota Blade in Japan.
What do we get on comparing functions of Toyota Prius and Toyota Auris?
The Prius has got a spacious boot along with a nicely built floor; the floor obscures a “secret compartment” under it. The Auris on the other side offers you a compromised boot because the battery takes up whole space.
On comparing Prius VS Auris, We see that Prius offers a huge advantage for anyone serious about the economy. It has MPG tracking through which you can track mpg per-journey. You can also check your previous graphs and such information can be real helpful at times. This is missing in Auris.
The HUD: It’s another merit of Prius. It turns out to be genuinely helpful when maintaining speed or engine mode, to keep an eye on the pathway. But in Arius, you’ll need to look down at the analog meter. This can be irritating.
You get a bonus point in for your driving position too. The wheels are adjustable; while the Auris always seems to be a little high, which compensate you to bump the seat up.
Prius offers you better Bluetooth connectivity and voice control, then what you get in Auris. It also has good sound quality of the audio system.
While Auris has small rear view screen, the Prius offers a larger one. It has a large screen for Reverse cam which makes it easier to see what’s going on than the tiny display.
What do we get on comparing the style of Toyota Prius and Toyota Auris?
Toyota Auris has a much-styled interior with dark leather seats, dark gray materials which provide a warm and comfortable ambiance. Prius, on the other hand, has cheap gray plastic material.
Auris has electric folding mirrors which can be very helpful at times, especially when you have compromising space in your garage or parking lot. Prius is missing this one.
The USB compatibility is amazing in Auris. Just plug in your cable and you’re all set to play whatever you want. Prius surprisingly has got no USB; they have Bluetooth option for music.
Auris gives you brilliant DRLs and auto headlights.
The Steering wheels being sporty are more comfortable than that of what Toyota Prius has.
In the small car segment, two car giants Toyota and Nissan have launched their new babies Passo and March respectively in Asian Market in 2004. The comparison between Toyota Passo Vs Nissan March is one of the hot topics in the car world today because of their various amazing features. Let us explore what is the hot buzz about these two super mini cars.
Toyota Passo Vs Nissan March, the battle begins
Toyota Passo is ideal for four passengers, but in an emergency, the fifth passengers can also find a comfortable seat inside. The car is absolute fuel-efficient. The interior is not highly posh but you cannot expect high interior in a low budget car. The car has a five-door hatchback. One can look for both the three-cylinder engine and the four-cylinder engine in Passo.
Nissan March is also four-seater car but accommodates one extra passenger easily. You cannot ask premium features here, but at the price, the car is the best buy. It offers three-door as well as a five-door hatchback. It also provides two-door convertible coupe. It features inline four-cylindrical engine in many variables ranging from the petrol engine (1000cc) to diesel engine (1,461 CC)
Toyota Passo 2006 is easy to drive a car. The size of Passo is larger than its previous version Storia. With sufficient cargo capacity (630 liters) and a comfortable interior, the car provides everything that a modern road as well as driver needs. Its gear shifter is on the dash while handbrakes are under the steering column. It has special swiveling front seats suitable for elders and those who are in wheelchairs.
The K12 third generation March is famous for its comfortable interior. It has a sliding rear seat to make extra room in need. In both automatic and manual versions, the gearshift is in the traditional floor position. The front seat is swiveling. The car looks Spartan but it has all the facilities that any supermini car must have.
The match of Toyota Passo Vs Nissan March is tied here as both shows somewhat the same kind of interior.
Passo is the first generation car. It is aerodynamic that focuses more on fuel efficiency than looks. The car is safe to drive and do full justice with the price in terms of the exterior. It is 3,630 mm in length, 1,550 mm tall. It has the wide of 1.665mm. The look is sturdy but sway is definitely missing on turns. It has trendy bumpers and side mid guards. The rear spoiler is the coolest feature in Passo.
The March is not behind when it comes to the exterior. It has a 70mm longer wheelbase than the previous generation. The car shows its curves and sways perfectly. The headlamps look vibrant and tall. Its body design is versatile. For example, three and five-door hatchback, two-doors convertible coupe. Such diversity is very rare in the small cars.
Here, the match of Toyota Passo Vs Nissan March goes to March for its design and versatility.
Apart from fuel efficiency, the car is stable in turns, which is cool. You do not feel patch while cornering. This Japanese car comes with 2 models DBA-KGC10 and DBA-KGC15. Both offer 71bhp, 996cc l3 (inline 3 cylinder engine). The average speed on the road is 18.4 km/l full time while at the front wheel drive model it is 21km/l. if you upgrade it to l4 inline 4 cylinder engine) 0f 1,297cc, the accelerator is more receptive.
Like Passo, March is also solid at turns, which is great. The model code CBA-AK12 is an inline 4 cylinder engine car with 1,240cc. At front wheel drive, the car gives 19.0km/l average speed. It offers 97bhp engine, which is fun to drive. Another version 1,386cc CR14DE L4 is also available in the market. The car is perfect for urban driving.
For me, both cars represent different styles suitable for personal choice. If you are looking a car with a simple look, high fuel efficiency and .fun to drive, Passo is your car. However, if you want extra features like the great look, versatility in design and thrilling acceleration, March is perfect for you.
The battle of Toyota Passo Vs Nissan March is almost a tie. Both shout different appeal so it is entirely your personal decision to choose one.
The clash of superminis: Toyota Vitz Vs Mazda Demio
Nowadays, it is very important to consider fuel efficiency and vehicle size when buying a car. The reason is parking is limited and the commute to work can be very long, increasing the cost of owning a car. For this reason, the demand for super mini car raises up rapidly in the urban area. Almost all car brands offer a super mini in the market. Among all the famous global players like Honda, Hyundai, and Fiat, Mazda and Toyota offer two of the most dependable and economical units within the super mini class: Toyota Vitz vs Mazda Demio. Both the cars are proud flag bearers of the super mini segment, ideal for a small family ride.
For a long time, there is a perception that supermini cars are cheap – cheaply made, cheaply designed, and cheaply constructed. That perception was changed totally when Toyota Vitz came. Toyota Vitz interior is made from top quality materials and is designed to be driver accessible. The centrist instrument panel is very convenient and attractive. It gives a feel of control that one may not find in other supermini cars. Toyota Vitz has simple and plain interior lines, helping the driver to focus during the commute.
Mazda released the first 2 generations of Demio with cheap interiors. However, the third generation Demio is built on the new DE platform, and it is far from “cheap”. It uses light weight material and makes the overall dimensions of the car smaller. Faux chrome and back lighting give the interior of Mazda Demio the feel that counteracts its minimalism. The shifter is aptly placed within driver’s convenient reach. To keep the driver concentrate on the road ahead, the compact gauge cluster is placed in front-and-center. The seats are most commonly covered by clothe; they are sturdy and comfortable. There are also a lot of storage area in side the car, making it very convenient. The interior is very simple, yet very functional at every aspect.
Both the cars make an impactifull external look that is better than almost all cars in the super mini segment. While Toyota Vitz brags about a slightly higher wheelbase as well as a boot space; Mazda Demio is all about looking good and sporty, which has actually helped the car look more expensive than it really is.
Even the design of Mazda Demio is done in such a manner that it looks every bit of a graceful beast. But fairly speaking we think it is Toyota Vitz that has a slight upper hand.
Interestingly, both Japanese car makers seem to have perfected the look of their respective cars. They use teardrop headlights and bumpers that
are very unique and original. While Toyota Vitz looks a little boxy, Mazda Demio affords to use the flow design that makes it look somewhat more embellished.
Redundant to say, but the engine and the fuel efficiency for the cars in this segment can make or break the product. Now, luckily for both Toyota Vitz and Mazda Demio, the fuel efficiency is remarkable and the engines are state of art as compared to most other superminis. Under this head, Mazda Demio scores slightly higher than Toyota Vitz due to superior fuel efficiency.
The Toyota Vitz has a higher engine capacity at 1496cc, of the two.
Handling and overall driving experience
Under this head, Toyota Vitz offers a higher torque which is actually a pleasant surprise for most buyers of this segment as no other apart from Demio gets close to the number. Mazda Demio, has tried and eliminated the obnoxious road noise typical to superminis.
In our verdict, it is absolutely impossible to pick a clear winner in this case given the fact that both the cars give each other a good competition and are also priced very reasonably close. But here’s the thing, as a buyer if catering to the space needs is your priority, we think Toyota Vitz should be your first choice whereas if it is better fuel economy you are looking at, Mazda Demio is the perfect car for you; since those are the only two heads where both cars vary most tangibly from each other.