JAPANESE TOYOTA PRIUS Vs TOYOTA ARIUS : A COMPARISON

Brief Comparison between Toyota Prius vs Toyota Arius
 

Toyota Prius

It is a full hybrid car with an electric mid-size hatchback. Formerly it was a sedan. The Prius which was developed and manufactured by Toyota is among the cleanest vehicles sold in the United States. It also got ranked as the most efficient gasoline-powered car in 2016. First launched for sale in Japan but later Toyota Prius ruled the global market after being launched worldwide in 2000.

It was sold over 90 international markets. Toyota later expanded the Prius family and added more automobiles to its line. It globally accumulated the sale of 5.7 million in 2016

Toyota Auris

The Toyota Auris has been derived from the Toyota Corolla. It is a compact hatchback. The first generation was started with Corolla and the second one had compact five-door hatchback and station wagon. More luxurious Auris was named Toyota Blade in Japan.

What do we get on comparing functions of Toyota Prius and Toyota Auris?

The Prius has got a spacious boot along with a nicely built floor; the floor obscures a “secret compartment” under it. The Auris on the other side offers you a compromised boot because the battery takes up whole space.

On comparing Prius VS Auris, We see that Prius offers a huge advantage for anyone serious about the economy. It has MPG tracking through which you can track mpg per-journey. You can also check your previous graphs and such information can be real helpful at times. This is missing in Auris.

The HUD: It’s another merit of Prius. It turns out to be genuinely helpful when maintaining speed or engine mode, to keep an eye on the pathway. But in Arius, you’ll need to look down at the analog meter. This can be irritating.

You get a bonus point in for your driving position too. The wheels are adjustable; while the Auris always seems to be a little high, which compensate you to bump the seat up.

Prius offers you better Bluetooth connectivity and voice control, then what you get in Auris. It also has good sound quality of the audio system.

While Auris has small rear view screen, the Prius offers a larger one. It has a large screen for Reverse cam which makes it easier to see what’s going on than the tiny display.

What do we get on comparing the style of Toyota Prius and Toyota Auris?

Toyota Auris has a much-styled interior with dark leather seats, dark gray materials which provide a warm and comfortable ambiance. Prius, on the other hand, has cheap gray plastic material.

Auris has electric folding mirrors which can be very helpful at times, especially when you have compromising space in your garage or parking lot. Prius is missing this one.

The USB compatibility is amazing in Auris. Just plug in your cable and you’re all set to play whatever you want. Prius surprisingly has got no USB; they have Bluetooth option for music.

Auris gives you brilliant DRLs and auto headlights.

The Steering wheels being sporty are more comfortable than that of what Toyota Prius has.

JAPANESE TOYOTA PASSO Vs NISSAN MARCH : A COMPARISON

Toyota Passo Vs Nissan March: Clash of Cars

In the small car segment, two car giants Toyota and Nissan have launched their new babies Passo and March respectively in Asian Market in 2004. The comparison between Toyota Passo Vs Nissan March is one of the hot topics in the car world today because of their various amazing features. Let us explore what is the hot buzz about these two super mini cars.

Toyota Passo Vs Nissan March, the battle begins

Toyota Passo is ideal for four passengers, but in an emergency, the fifth passengers can also find a comfortable seat inside. The car is absolute fuel-efficient. The interior is not highly posh but you cannot expect high interior in a low budget car. The car has a five-door hatchback. One can look for both the three-cylinder engine and the four-cylinder engine in Passo.

Nissan March is also four-seater car but accommodates one extra passenger easily. You cannot ask premium features here, but at the price, the car is the best buy. It offers three-door as well as a five-door hatchback. It also provides two-door convertible coupe. It features inline four-cylindrical engine in many variables ranging from the petrol engine (1000cc) to diesel engine (1,461 CC)

 Interiors:

  Toyota Passo Vs Nissan March Interiors

Toyota Passo 2006 is easy to drive a car. The size of Passo is larger than its previous version Storia. With sufficient cargo capacity (630 liters) and a comfortable interior, the car provides everything that a modern road as well as driver needs. Its gear shifter is on the dash while handbrakes are under the steering column. It has special swiveling front seats suitable for elders and those who are in wheelchairs.

The K12 third generation March is famous for its comfortable interior. It has a sliding rear seat to make extra room in need. In both automatic and manual versions, the gearshift is in the traditional floor position. The front seat is swiveling. The car looks Spartan but it has all the facilities that any supermini car must have.

The match of Toyota Passo Vs Nissan March is tied here as both shows somewhat the same kind of interior.

 Exterior:

                                                                   Nissan March Vs Toyota Passo Interiors

Passo is the first generation car. It is aerodynamic that focuses more on fuel efficiency than looks. The car is safe to drive and do full justice with the price in terms of the exterior. It is 3,630 mm in length, 1,550 mm tall. It has the wide of 1.665mm. The look is sturdy but sway is definitely missing on turns. It has trendy bumpers and side mid guards. The rear spoiler is the coolest feature in Passo.

The March is not behind when it comes to the exterior. It has a 70mm longer wheelbase than the previous generation. The car shows its curves and sways perfectly. The headlamps look vibrant and tall. Its body design is versatile. For example, three and five-door hatchback, two-doors convertible coupe. Such diversity is very rare in the small cars.

Here, the match of Toyota Passo Vs Nissan March goes to March for its design and versatility.

Driving Experience:

                                                                                  Nissan March Vs Toyota Passo

Apart from fuel efficiency, the car is stable in turns, which is cool. You do not feel patch while cornering. This Japanese car comes with 2 models DBA-KGC10 and DBA-KGC15. Both offer 71bhp, 996cc l3 (inline 3 cylinder engine). The average speed on the road is 18.4 km/l full time while at the front wheel drive model it is 21km/l. if you upgrade it to l4 inline 4 cylinder engine) 0f 1,297cc, the accelerator is more receptive.

Like Passo, March is also solid at turns, which is great. The model code CBA-AK12 is an inline 4 cylinder engine car with 1,240cc. At front wheel drive, the car gives 19.0km/l average speed. It offers 97bhp engine, which is fun to drive. Another version 1,386cc CR14DE L4 is also available in the market. The car is perfect for urban driving.

Conclusion:

For me, both cars represent different styles suitable for personal choice. If you are looking a car with a simple look, high fuel efficiency and .fun to drive, Passo is your car. However, if you want extra features like the great look, versatility in design and thrilling acceleration, March is perfect for you.

The battle of Toyota Passo Vs Nissan March is almost a tie. Both shout different appeal so it is entirely your personal decision to choose one.

Article Source

JAPANESE TOYOTA VITZ Vs MAZDA DEMIO : A COMPARISON

The clash of superminis: Toyota Vitz Vs Mazda Demio

Nowadays, it is very important to consider fuel efficiency and vehicle size when buying a car. The reason is parking is limited and the commute to work can be very long, increasing the cost of owning a car. For this reason, the demand for super mini car raises up rapidly in the urban area. Almost all car brands offer a super mini in the market. Among all the famous global players like Honda, Hyundai, and Fiat, Mazda and Toyota offer two of the most dependable and economical units within the super mini class: Toyota Vitz vs Mazda Demio. Both the cars are proud flag bearers of the super mini segment, ideal for a small family ride.

Interiors:

For a long time, there is a perception that supermini cars are cheap – cheaply made, cheaply designed, and cheaply constructed. That perception was changed totally when Toyota Vitz came. Toyota Vitz interior is made from top quality materials and is designed to be driver accessible. The centrist instrument panel is very convenient and attractive. It gives a feel of control that one may not find in other supermini cars. Toyota Vitz has simple and plain interior lines, helping the driver to focus during the commute.

Mazda released the first 2 generations of Demio with cheap interiors. However, the third generation Demio is built on the new DE platform, and it is far from “cheap”. It uses light weight material and makes the overall dimensions of the car smaller. Faux chrome and back lighting give the interior of Mazda Demio the feel that counteracts its minimalism. The shifter is aptly placed within driver’s convenient reach. To keep the driver concentrate on the road ahead, the compact gauge cluster is placed in front-and-center. The seats are most commonly covered by clothe; they are sturdy and comfortable. There are also a lot of storage area in side the car, making it very convenient. The interior is very simple, yet very functional at every aspect.

Exteriors:

Both the cars make an impactifull external look that is better than almost all cars in the super mini segment. While Toyota Vitz brags about a slightly higher wheelbase as well as a boot space; Mazda Demio is all about looking good and sporty, which has actually helped the car look more expensive than it really is.

Even the design of Mazda Demio is done in such a manner that it looks every bit of a graceful beast. But fairly speaking we think it is Toyota Vitz that has a slight upper hand.

Interestingly, both Japanese car makers seem to have perfected the look of their respective cars. They use teardrop headlights and bumpers that

are very unique and original. While Toyota Vitz looks a little boxy, Mazda Demio affords to use the flow design that makes it look somewhat more embellished.

Engine:

Redundant to say, but the engine and the fuel efficiency for the cars in this segment can make or break the product. Now, luckily for both Toyota Vitz and Mazda Demio, the fuel efficiency is remarkable and the engines are state of art as compared to most other superminis. Under this head, Mazda Demio scores slightly higher than Toyota Vitz due to superior fuel efficiency.

The Toyota Vitz has a higher engine capacity at 1496cc, of the two.

Handling and overall driving experience

Under this head, Toyota Vitz offers a higher torque which is actually a pleasant surprise for most buyers of this segment as no other apart from Demio gets close to the number. Mazda Demio, has tried and eliminated the obnoxious road noise typical to superminis.

Conclusions:

In our verdict, it is absolutely impossible to pick a clear winner in this case given the fact that both the cars give each other a good competition and are also priced very reasonably close. But here’s the thing, as a buyer if catering to the space needs is your priority, we think Toyota Vitz should be your first choice whereas if it is better fuel economy you are looking at, Mazda Demio is the perfect car for you; since those are the only two heads where both cars vary most tangibly from each other.

Nissan Note vs Honda Fit: Which One is Your New Hatchback?

Japanese Nissan Note vs Honda Fit: Which One is Your New Hatchback?

Good-looking subcompact hatchbacks have a strong fanbase. Their attractive looks, good maneuverability, and strong fuel economy have always created a strong appeal among the potential customers.

Two such popular subcompact hatchbacks in this line are Nissan Note and Honda Fit. Make a Nissan Note vs Honda Fit comparison, and you’ll find that both the cars look pretty good, drive well, and look almost identical! Besides, their smart cargo management is perfect for packing even a week’s shopping.

Nissan Note vs Honda Fit Comparison

Comparing the two hatchbacks side-by-side is the right way to find out their positive and negative sides. We’ve used Nissan Note 2015 and Honda Fit 2015 for this comparison.

Comfort

Both the hatchbacks have five seats but the Note provides more headroom and a longer wheelbase to the comfort of adult passengers. Its interior also looks better due to the black trim and a mix of chrome and silver accents. However, the cushier seats of the Fit will definitely win hearts.

Versatility

The Note has a multi-level floor and a bigger trunk space but the Fit is more versatile if you consider its folding options. Fold the seats of Honda Fit and you’ll be surprised seeing how many things you can stuff into such a small car. Flip up the seat bottoms and you can easily fit a keg of soda pop or a weird piece of furniture.

Tech

The Fit clearly leads this section with a wide range of features and entertainment properties. It has an infotainment display that can be turned into a blind-spot camera, power windows, Bluetooth audio streaming feature, six speakers, and a multi-angle rear view camera.

On the other hand, the Note has a rear-view camera but it doesn’t feature the brand’s AroundView technology, and four speakers. Both the cars have climate control feature with the Fit having heated seats option.

Drive

The Fit is a bit sporty while the Note drives smoother. Driving the Note is relaxed as you can comfortably take turns at sharp bends. However, the Fit has a more powerful 1.5L engine that produces 130 hp. On the contrary, Note’s 1.6L engine does not deliver more than 109 hp.

Value

Both the cars provide almost similar fuel economy. The Note burns 7.1L for crossing 100 km while Fit burns 7.4L for crossing the same distance. However, Fit is a better option with its faster speed, versatility, and more entertainment options. Nevertheless, the Note can be a good option too if you can score a good purchase from the secondhand market.

Article Source

8 Top Budget-Friendly SUV Cars

8 Top Budget-Friendly SUV Cars From Japan

To have a sports utility SUV (sports utility vehicle), can be cheaper than you think. Some of the famous SUV vehicles in this line are 4X2 and 4X4, and such kind of vehicles will cost heavily in the market. However, some modest version can be bought for an affordable price. Here are a list and comparison of SUV Japanese used cars (2015) that will help you find budget-friendly SUV cars. Check out the models below and consider the possibility of having one of these in your garage.

Renault Duster

The first Renault SUV was released in October 2011. By the end of 2013 they started manufacturing SUV vehicles for an affordable price, that is, less than $25000. The entry SUV model offers 4X2 drive, 1.6 engine, 16V Hi-Flex, 110/115 horsepower and five-speed gears. In addition, the car also features electric locks, air conditioning, and power steering.

Chery Tiggo

Chery Tiggo, one of the most famous car manufacturers in the world, has introduced their first initial model SUV for an affordable price. The car has four wheel drive, 2.0, 16V engine and 135 horsepower. Some of the appealing features of this model are the ABS brake system, alloy wheels, and the LED lights. Last year, they had introduced the automatic version of this car with four-speed for a price of about $28000.

Lifan X60

Lifan X60 is one of the cheapest SUV available in the market. They are accessible for around $23000 with 1.8-liter VVT engine equipped with four cylinders in cross line, makes 128 horsepower. The volume of the dicky is around 405 liters.

Ford Ecosport

One of the best-selling SUVs in the world, the Ford EcoSport is still among the cheapest in its class seven after undergoing a complete renovation in 2012. The price of this vehicle with 1.6 engine flex will only cost around $28000. The new generation model comes equipped with electric steering, air-conditioning, front glass, locks and mirrors, SYNC multimedia system with voice commands and Bluetooth, dual airbag, ABS brake lights with LEDs with all series.

Mitsubishi Pajero Tr4

The entry model of Pajero TR4 2014 costs around $35000. Some of the highlights of this model are the engine with 16V, 2.0 flex, with strength up to 140 horses, power steering, air conditioning, power Windows, locks and mirrors, CD player with MP3 and Bluetooth and dual airbag. The traditional 4X4 traction of the Pajero was reduced to 4 in this version to make it commercially competitive.

Hyundai Tucson

It is possible to have a Hyundai Tucson for an affordable price. The car is available with 2.0 16 V engines, with 145 horsepower and traction 4X2.

Suzuki Grand Vitara

The Grand Vitara is Suzuki’s flagship. The 2013 model has 4 wheel drive, manual gear, and gasoline motor with four cylinders, 2.0 16V, and 140 horsepower.

Chevrolet Captiva

Captiva is the feeling of Chevrolet SUVs. The Ecotec version comes equipped with the four-cylinder engine, 2.4 petrol, 16V, direct injection and 185 horsepower. The model has a six-speed transmission and the largest one among the reasonably priced SUV.

Toyota ist vs Honda Fit: Which One’s the Best Super Mini?

Toyota ist vs Honda Fit: Which One’s the Best Super Mini?

The Toyota Ist and Honda Fit are adorable super minis that have been becoming popular in the used car market day by day. The young people are the main customers of these subcompact cars as they fit all the criteria to be the first car of a college student or a young couple – smaller size, smart features, easy to park, and budget-friendly. Let’s take a look at a comparison of Toyota ist vs Honda Fit.

Honda Fit vs Toyota Ist: An Introduction

The Honda Fit is a production of the Japanese automobile manufacturer Honda. It first entered the market in 2001 and since then has been one of the most popular subcompact cars. It is a five-door hatchback that shares the design of the company’s global small-car platform.

On the other hand, the Toyota Ist is a production of the Japanese automobile company Toyota. It first came to the Japanese market in 2001 and was later exported to various international markets including the United States, Europe, and the Middle East.

The Ist is a multi-use compact car that features the style of an SUV and the roominess of a wagon. It used the Vitz as the base model but was able to create its own fan base because of its functionality and enhanced safety features.

Toyota Ist vs Honda Fit Comparison

Appearance & Comfort

If you compare the looks of Toyota Ist vs Honda Fit, both the cars will score almost the same. The Ist looks attractive with its SUV-like styling on the outside and a roomy interior with boldly rounded edges.

On the contrary, the Fit dons a playful look with its sporty demeanor and stylish exterior. Fit’s interior is vinyl, just like the Ist, but has a better duo tone finish. However, the Fit wins the comfort division with its multiple seating arrangements suitable for accommodating bigger and taller passengers and holding more cargo.

Both the cars provide standard safety features including anti-locking brakes (ABS) and airbags (SRS).

Engine Performance

The Toyota Ist features a 1NZ-FE VVTi while the Honda Fit comes with a GD3 L15A VTEC 1.5L engine. Both the small engines deliver big on performance, acceleration, pulling power, and fuel economy despite their limited capacities.

The Ist’s engine features the double overhead camshaft lobes (DOHC) toprovide high engine power and practical fuel economy.

On the other hand, the Fit’s single overhead camshaft (SOHC) ensures fuel efficiency and provides better low engine power at low revolutions. Its CVT improves engine response and makes acceleration smoother.

Handling

The road performance of both the cars is excellent despite their subcompact sizes. They have an independent suspension that is good for high-performance driving, taking U-turns, and turning into the corners. They also hold well on uneven, bumpy roads.

Both the cars are reliable, well built, and have standard technical features. However, the Toyota Ist vs Honda Fit comparison makes it clear that the Fit provides better comfort and amenities while the Ist has higher resale value because of its cheaper and easily available parts.

The Fit appeals to young people more who are a sucker for advanced and entertainment features and like to have an adrenaline rush on roads. However, the Ist is for mature people and small families for its resale price and value for money.

Article Source